





Pairs receive a playful prompt with opposing stances and only ninety seconds each to argue, then must switch sides and summarize the other view. The timer forces clarity, perspective-taking, and respectful brevity, while scoring rewards listening behaviors and evidence, not volume or theatrics.
Small teams collect points by giving bite-sized, behavior-based feedback cards that include an observation, impact, and suggestion. A bonus is awarded when someone requests feedback. The fast pace makes candor feel normal, and practice reframes critique as a gift that strengthens relationships.
Without speaking, groups construct a structure from limited materials under shifting constraints. Players use gestures, sticky notes, and roles to coordinate. Debrief focuses on forming shared mental models, reading cues, and welcoming quieter contributors whose strengths often shine when noise subsides.
Create a checklist with three levels: emerging, consistent, exemplary. Behaviors include clarifying goals, inviting dissent, and paraphrasing before disagreeing. Share rubrics beforehand, so attention lands on practice, not judgment. Over time, learners self-assess honestly because criteria are concrete, respectful, and aligned to outcomes.
Create a checklist with three levels: emerging, consistent, exemplary. Behaviors include clarifying goals, inviting dissent, and paraphrasing before disagreeing. Share rubrics beforehand, so attention lands on practice, not judgment. Over time, learners self-assess honestly because criteria are concrete, respectful, and aligned to outcomes.
Create a checklist with three levels: emerging, consistent, exemplary. Behaviors include clarifying goals, inviting dissent, and paraphrasing before disagreeing. Share rubrics beforehand, so attention lands on practice, not judgment. Over time, learners self-assess honestly because criteria are concrete, respectful, and aligned to outcomes.